Chapter 4 Question 2

While reading chapter 4 and the arguments on UFO there were 3 different physicist that explained there personal feelings on UFO’s. First was Edward U. Condom who was a physicist at the University of Colorado. In his writings he said that UFO were a good field to conduct studies on, however they could not find sufficient evidence to proof the existence of these UFO’s. I got the idea that Condom believes that people should keep studying on UFO’s if they have a reason and or evidence to continue to do their studies but otherwise they should just stop . The next researcher was J. Allenhynek and he claimed that there is a possibility that UFO exist . He believed that scientist have to up their research on UFOs. The last researcher, is Royston Paynter and his argument was more of that UFO’s have the possibility of being real and that scientist should collect evidence and seek for facts to prove that UFO’s are real. I think Paynter makes the best argument because he is in more of the middle ground and does not sway towards one side specifically.

-Mike Ross